VJEL Newsroom

Published: Volume 25, Issue 2 of the Vermont Journal of Environmental Law

By VJEL

January 3, 2024

 

The Vermont Journal of Environmental Law (VJEL) is pleased to announce the publication of Volume 25, Issue 2. Issue 2 features one two Articles and one student Note ranging from land use issues in small-scale agriculture through the western United States; to applying Vermont’s Environmental Justice Act to Tennessee; and finally, land use regulation in Vermont’s outdoor industry. VJEL publishes exclusively online, and this Issue may be accessed on our website by clicking this link to view our Volume 25, Issue 2 Publication or by accessing our Volume 25 Publications from the navigation header.

 

Articles:

Land Use Law Analysis to Empower Small-Scale Agriculture in Teton County, Wyoming

By Rachael Romsa et al.

 

Several western regions, including Teton County, Wyoming, face challenges of meeting food demands via small-scale agriculture. By having vast swaths of public land, available land for local agriculture is limited. Mountain ranges and forests make food importation difficult, especially during winter months. All the while tourism demands for food continue to grow. This Article focuses on legal frameworks to empower local or regional food supplies in western states, using Teton County, Wyoming, and its Conservation District as a case study for feasibility with its unique conditions.

 

To tackle these problems, Romsa et al. propose small-scale agriculture to not only limit further development on private lands, but also produce food for local communities—all the while supporting local farmers. But policy planning is lacking in Teton County. Instead, the authors analyzed three existing land use planning and regulatory frameworks that could supplement this development:

• • The Jackson/Teton County Comprehensive Plan
  • The Teton County land development regulations (LDRs)
  • The Town of Jackson LDRs.

 

For each policy framework, the authors first analyze where small-scale agriculture could be supported or challenged. The authors then highlight how other communities have used their own comprehensive plans for small-scale agriculture. For each regulatory framework, the authors give their recommendations as to how the frameworks may better support agricultural production.

 

Romsa et al. conclude by finding that the Jackson/Teton County Comprehensive plan would need a new chapter or amendments to existing chapters to better support small-scale agriculture. For the Teton County and Town of Jackson LDRs, they would need to incorporate a more expansive definition of “agriculture.” This would allow for agriculture in more zoning districts coupled with additional policy and regulatory tools such as Planned Resort Zones and Planned Unit Development Zones. Last, Teton County could find support in these revisions from other communities that have used similar strategies and the growing support from local residents.

 

A Comparative Look: Applying Vermont’s Environmental Justice Act in Tennessee

By K. Ashley Eshleman

 

In 2022, Vermont enacted the Environmental Justice Act. Vermont’s EJ Act includes impact analyses, community engagement, and an online mapping tool centered around environmental effects on certain groups of citizens. This Article focuses on key points for a potential environmental justice bill drafted in the Tennessee legislature, using Vermont’s Environmental Justice Act as a model. The federal government, much like Vermont, has been looking at legislative and regulatory action to address EJ concerns, including many programs created by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

 

The author first looks at federal initiatives to address EJ concerns through legislation, executive orders, and agency indicatives by the EPA. Following that, Eshleman provides background to Vermont’s EJ Act, noting that it is more comprehensive than the EPA’s recognition and emphasis of fairness and equity in government decision-making. Additionally, Vermont offers more classes such as race, color, income, and English language proficiency.

 

Following the analysis of federal and Vermont initiatives, the author then details Tennessee’s background, which does not currently have any EJ legislation, with only minimal mentions of EJ perspectives from the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation. Tennessee boasts a much larger and more diverse population than Vermont, many of which work in agriculture and who have been historically discriminated against, which was only worsened by Trump-era policies that encouraged non-citizen deportations. In addition, much of the lower-income population is among these diverse groups. Diverse and poor groups are more vulnerable to poor water quality and flooding after large rain events, while redlined communities suffer the most from the effects of climate change.

 

From there, Eshleman discusses how Tennessee can implement and adapt a similar bill for the state. She focuses on addressing pollution, agriculture, community engagement, and improving language access, all to secure greater protections than Title VI of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 in Tennessee. Eshleman concludes that Vermont’s Act is not perfect, and would need modification, especially for identifying focus populations and implementations of impact analyses. But nonetheless, she explains, Vermont’s Act would theoretically work if implemented in Tennessee if disparities within the state are better identified—first starting with defining what “environmental justice” is.

 

Student Note:

Givings and Takings: Challenges to Regulation Under Vermont’s Act 250

By Taylor Scott Berkley: 3L at Vermont Law and Graduate School and VJEL’s Senior Articles Editor.

 

Focusing on ski area development, Berkley proposes a constitutional analysis of federal takings doctrine under Act 250, a comprehensive environmental law focused on land use and development that has far-ranging regulations and restrictions. Berkley highlights the contrasting nature of competing interests: state consistency over local control, economic growth against ecological preservation, and entrenched interests against emerging needs.

 

Berkley first begins by looking back at the historical and ecological roles of land-use regulations in Vermont, as well as some context behind takings jurisprudence, all while focusing on the unique need for the state’s regulation and renewal. Following the background discussion, this Note moves into how Act 250 interplays with the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Vermont Constitution, analyzing legal decisions between the two frameworks by the state’s supreme court.

 

The author concludes by stating that with the growing environmental-focused climate amongst Vermonters, the courts are likely to hear more takings challenges to Act 250. Thus, calling for more specificity in regulations to reduce friction between private land rights and state regulations.

 

VJEL would like to thank the authors for their submissions, as well as the Editorial Staff for their hard work to produce Volume 25, Issue 2. Their contributions continue to add exemplary and accessible work to the environmental law field.